Garfield Greenwood v. Loretta E. Lynch

656 F. App'x 336
CourtCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
DecidedAugust 1, 2016
Docket14-72731
StatusUnpublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 656 F. App'x 336 (Garfield Greenwood v. Loretta E. Lynch) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garfield Greenwood v. Loretta E. Lynch, 656 F. App'x 336 (9th Cir. 2016).

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Garfield Greenwood, a native and citizen of Jamaica, petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) order denying his motion to reopen removal proceedings. We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We review for abuse of discretion the denial of a motion to reopen, Najmabadi v. Holder, 597 F.3d 983, 986 (9th Cir. 2010), and we deny the petition for review.

The BIA did not abuse its discretion in denying Greenwood’s motion to reopen as untimely where he filed it three years after the BIA’s final decision, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(2), and he failed to demonstrate changed country conditions in Jamaica to qualify for an exception to the time limitation for motions to reopen, see 8 C.F.R. § 1003.2(c)(3)(ii); Najmabadi, 597 F.3d at 987-990 (evidence must be “qualitatively different” to warrant reopening).

PETITION FOR REVIEW DENIED.

**

This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Garfield Greenwood v. Merrick Garland
36 F.4th 1232 (Ninth Circuit, 2022)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
656 F. App'x 336, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garfield-greenwood-v-loretta-e-lynch-ca9-2016.