Garesche v. Textured Coatings of America, Inc.

352 So. 2d 1207, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16929
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided November 22, 1977·No. No. 76-1952·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

DAUKSCH, Judge.

Appellant sued the manufacturer, distributor and applicator of Tex-Cote, a fiberglass and asbestos material advertised to be an end to painting problems on house exteriors. The complaint alleges breach of warranty, fraud and negligence on the part of the various Defendants in the advertising, manufacturing and applying of the product. Upon a review of the evidence presented we find the court erred in directing a verdict for the Defendants.

For example, Appellants proved they relied upon allegedly untrue statements in a Textured Coatings of America, Inc. brochure which was distributed by or through the other Appellees. Appellants established their reliance thereon was to their detriment and otherwise established a prima fa-cie case against the Appellees. In addition, the uncontroverted proof was that the Tex-Cote, which had deteriorated to an unsightly peeling, could not be removed and it would take $1,650.00 to cover the unappealing areas with aluminum siding. Of course, maybe the Appellees at trial can prove otherwise but the matter should be tried. We remand this matter for trial on all issues.

REVERSED and REMANDED with directions.

CROSS and ANSTEAD, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Garesche v. Textured Coatings of America, Inc., 352 So. 2d 1207, 1977 Fla. App. LEXIS 16929 (Fla. Ct. App. 1977).

352 So. 2d 1207 (Garesche v. Textured Coatings of America, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

King v. Kayak Manufacturing Corp.
387 S.E.2d 511 (West Virginia Supreme Court, 1989)
Blackton Bldg. Supply Co. v. Garesche
383 So. 2d 250 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1980)