Gares Corporation v. S & D Investments, L.L.C.
Opinion
NO. 07-06-0293-CV
IN THE COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE SEVENTH DISTRICT OF TEXAS AT AMARILLO
PANEL A
DECEMBER 21, 2006
GARES CORP., APPELLANT
V.
S & D INVESTMENTS, L.L.C., APPELLEE
FROM THE 218TH DISTRICT COURT OF LA SALLE COUNTY;
NO. 04-07-00064-CVL; HONORABLE STELLA H. SAXON, JUDGE
Before CAMPBELL and HANCOCK and PIRTLE, JJ.
ON JOINT MOTION TO EFFECTUATE SETTLEMENT AGREEMENT
Appellant, Gares Corporation (“Gares”), perfected an appeal from the trial court’s order granting appellee’s, S & D Investments, L.L.C. (“S & D”), Amended Motion for Enforcement of Judgment and Release of Lien and Motion for Sanctions and the trial court’s supplemental order granting S & D’s Amended Motion for Enforcement of Judgment and Release of Lien and Motion for Sanctions. The parties have filed a Joint Motion to Effectuate Settlement Agreement asserting that the parties have reached a settlement agreement. The joint motion requests that this court set aside the trial court’s judgment without regard to the merits and remand the case to the trial court for rendition of a
judgment in accordance with the parties’ agreement. This disposition is authorized by rules 42.1 (a)(2)(B) and 43.2(d) of the Texas Rules of Appellate Procedure. Finding the motion complies with the requirements of rules 6.6 and 42.1(a), we vacate the judgment of the trial court and remand for rendition of judgment in conformity with the parties’ agreement.
Having disposed of this appeal at the parties’ request, we will not entertain a motion for rehearing and our mandate shall issue forthwith.
Per Curiam
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gares Corporation v. S & D Investments, L.L.C. (Gares Corporation v. S & D Investments, L.L.C.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.