Gardner v. Williamson

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit
DecidedJune 3, 2009
Docket08-8478
StatusUnpublished

This text of Gardner v. Williamson (Gardner v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner v. Williamson, (4th Cir. 2009).

Opinion

UNPUBLISHED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT

No. 08-8478

BARKLEY GARDNER,

Petitioner - Appellant,

v.

TROY WILLIAMSON; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS,

Respondents - Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-02050-H)

Submitted: May 7, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009

Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.

Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.

Barkley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:

Barkley Gardner, a federal inmate, appeals the

district court orders and judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241

(2006) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We

have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find

no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the

district court. See Gardner v. Williamson, No. 5:08-cv-02050-H

(E.D.N.C. May 13, 2008; Nov. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral

argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately

presented in the materials before the court and argument would

not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Power to grant writ
28 U.S.C. § 2241

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gardner v. Williamson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-williamson-ca4-2009.