Gardner v. Williamson
This text of Gardner v. Williamson (Gardner v. Williamson) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
UNPUBLISHED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FOURTH CIRCUIT
No. 08-8478
BARKLEY GARDNER,
Petitioner - Appellant,
v.
TROY WILLIAMSON; UNITED STATES BUREAU OF PRISONS,
Respondents - Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Eastern District of North Carolina, at Raleigh. Malcolm J. Howard, Senior District Judge. (5:08-cv-02050-H)
Submitted: May 7, 2009 Decided: June 3, 2009
Before MOTZ and SHEDD, Circuit Judges, and HAMILTON, Senior Circuit Judge.
Affirmed by unpublished per curiam opinion.
Barkley Gardner, Appellant Pro Se.
Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit. PER CURIAM:
Barkley Gardner, a federal inmate, appeals the
district court orders and judgment denying his 28 U.S.C. § 2241
(2006) petition and denying his motion for reconsideration. We
have reviewed the record and the district court orders and find
no error. Accordingly, we affirm on the reasoning of the
district court. See Gardner v. Williamson, No. 5:08-cv-02050-H
(E.D.N.C. May 13, 2008; Nov. 10, 2008). We dispense with oral
argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately
presented in the materials before the court and argument would
not aid the decisional process.
AFFIRMED
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Gardner v. Williamson, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-williamson-ca4-2009.