Gardner v. Warden

141 A.2d 684, 217 Md. 653, 1958 Md. LEXIS 655
Court of Appeals of Maryland·Decided May 27, 1958·No. [H.C. No. 121, September Term, 1957.]·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

217 Md. 653 (1958)
141 A.2d 684

GARDNER
v.
WARDEN OF MARYLAND PENITENTIARY

[H.C. No. 121, September Term, 1957.]

Court of Appeals of Maryland.

Decided May 27, 1958.

Before BRUNE, C.J., and HENDERSON, HAMMOND, PRESCOTT and HORNEY, JJ.

PER CURIAM:

The application for leave to appeal is denied with costs. Judge Byrnes properly ruled on the petition filed in the Baltimore City Court for a writ of habeas corpus that the involuntary character of a confession and the insufficiency of the evidence to convict the petitioner of "conspiracy" was reviewable on appeal but not on habeas corpus. The petitioner's claim — not passed upon by the court below — that he was not afforded process for witnesses, and the failure of the prosecuting witness to testify, affect the regularity of the proceedings and, absent a demand for compulsory process, do not concern the jurisdiction of the trial court. The mere statements by a petitioner (i) that he was held incommunicado without benefit of counsel, (ii) that he was put in double jeopardy, and (iii) that his ten-year sentence was unlawful, without more, are not sufficient allegations of fact to show a denial of constitutional rights.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Warden, 141 A.2d 684, 217 Md. 653, 1958 Md. LEXIS 655 (Md. 1958).

141 A.2d 684 (Gardner v. Warden) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Turner v. Warden
155 A.2d 69 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 2001)
Boyd v. Warden of Maryland House of Correction
145 A.2d 570 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1958)