Gardner v. State
This text of 26 S.W.2d 639 (Gardner v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
Offense, forgery of a land title; penalty, seven years in the penitentiary.
This is a companion case to that of E. F. Owen v. State, No. 12632, this day affirmed. The issues of law and fact in the two cases are practically identical. What is said in the opinion this day handed down in the Owen case, supra, disposes also of the instant case.
The alleged errors of the Court in refusing a continuance and in refusing to instruct the jury to not consider certain improper questions of the District Attorney appear as questions in addition to those discussed in the Owens case, supra. Both these have been examined and are believed t;o be without merit, and their importance, does not seem to justify discussion.
State’s motion for rehearing is granted and the former opinion reversing this case is withdrawn.
Judgment affirmed.
A firmed.
The foregoing opinion of the Commission of Appeals has been examined by the Judges of the Court of Criminal Appeals and approved by the Court.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
26 S.W.2d 639, 114 Tex. Crim. 584, 1930 Tex. Crim. App. LEXIS 248, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-state-texcrimapp-1930.