Gardner v. State of New York
This text of 22 N.E.2d 344 (Gardner v. State of New York) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The Appellate Division found that failure to instruct the infant claimant pursuant to the customary method was the proximate cause of her injuries. We think this finding is in accord with the weight of the evidence. The question whether the head stand exercise was inherently dangerous to young children, even when properly instructed, is not presented by the record.
In each action the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
22 N.E.2d 344, 281 N.Y. 212, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1000, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-state-of-new-york-ny-1939.