Gardner v. State of New York
22 N.E.2d 344, 281 N.Y. 212, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1000
New York Court of Appeals·Decided July 11, 1939·No. Claim 24499; Claim 24500·Published·Cited by 10 cases
Opinions
The Appellate Division found that failure to instruct the infant claimant pursuant to the customary method was the proximate cause of her injuries. We think this finding is in accord with the weight of the evidence. The question whether the head stand exercise was inherently dangerous to young children, even when properly instructed, is not presented by the record.
In each action the judgment should be affirmed, with costs.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gardner v. State of New York, 22 N.E.2d 344, 281 N.Y. 212, 1939 N.Y. LEXIS 1000 (N.Y. 1939).
22 N.E.2d 344 (Gardner v. State of New York) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Tabone v. State
116 Misc. 2d 864 (New York State Court of Claims, 1982)
Lorenzo v. Monroe Community College
72 A.D.2d 945 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1979)
Darrow v. West Genesee Central School District
41 A.D.2d 897 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1973)
Segerman v. Jones
259 A.2d 794 (Court of Appeals of Maryland, 1970)
Domino v. Mercurio
17 A.D.2d 342 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1962)
Clark v. Board of Education
304 N.Y. 488 (New York Court of Appeals, 1952)
Clark v. Board of Education
279 A.D. 605 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1951)
Brittan v. State
200 Misc. 743 (New York State Court of Claims, 1951)
LaValley v. Stanford
272 A.D.2d 183 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1947)
Edkins v. Board of Education
41 N.E.2d 75 (New York Court of Appeals, 1942)