Gardner v. State

399 S.W.3d 927, 2013 WL 2395971, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 685
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 4, 2013·No. No. WD 75021·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Lark Gardner (“Gardner”) appeals from the denial of his Rule 24.035 motion after an evidentiary hearing. He argues that his plea counsel was ineffective for failing to present mitigation evidence, in the form of testimony from his mother and medical records, at sentencing. Affirmed. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. State, 399 S.W.3d 927, 2013 WL 2395971, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 685 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

399 S.W.3d 927 (Gardner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.