Gardner v. State
263 So. 2d 604, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636
Opinion
We have examined the briefs and record filed in this appeal. We conclude that the requirements of Ch. 932.38, F.S.1969, now Ch. 925.07, F.S.1970, F.S.A. and of Snell v. Mayo, Fla.1956, 84 So.2d 581, were complied with, in that actual timely notice was received by defendant’s grandmother-guardian. We therefore affirm.
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gardner v. State, 263 So. 2d 604, 1972 Fla. App. LEXIS 6636 (Fla. Ct. App. 1972).
263 So. 2d 604 (Gardner v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Snell v. Mayo
84 So. 2d 581 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1956)