Gardner v. Schenectady Railway Co.

136 A.D. 934

Opinion

Decision modified by inserting after the words “Smith, P. J., not voting” the following words: “.he having participated in the consideration :of the case, under Rule "10 of the Rules of the Department, although not present at the oral argument.” (See 134 App. Div. 989.)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Schenectady Railway Co., 136 A.D. 934 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1910).

136 A.D. 934 (Gardner v. Schenectady Railway Co.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.