Gardner v. Roosevelt Hotel, Inc.
This text of 176 Misc. 546 (Gardner v. Roosevelt Hotel, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Defendant hotel was not liable as an innkeeper, and the questions of negligence, contributory negligence and assumption of risk were for the jury. The direction of verdict was improper under section 457-a of the Civil Practice Act, as amended. Under the General Business Law the place where the coat was checked constituted a “ check room,” but the question of whether liability was limited may not be raised for the first time on appeal. Evidence and decision on that point will be left to the court below on the new trial. (See Honig v. Riley, 244 N. Y. 105.)
Judgment reversed and new trial ordered, with costs to appellants to abide the event. Appeal from orders dismissed.
All concur. Present — Hammer, Shientag and McLaughlin, JJ.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
176 Misc. 546, 28 N.Y.S.2d 78, 1941 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 1838, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-roosevelt-hotel-inc-nyappterm-1941.