Gardner v. Roof Truss Sales, Inc.

188 So. 2d 802, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3446
CourtSupreme Court of Florida
DecidedJuly 20, 1966
DocketNo. 35479
StatusPublished

This text of 188 So. 2d 802 (Gardner v. Roof Truss Sales, Inc.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner v. Roof Truss Sales, Inc., 188 So. 2d 802, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3446 (Fla. 1966).

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

By petition for a writ of certiorari we have for review an order of the Florida Industrial Commission bearing date May 20, 1966.

We find that oral argument would serve no useful purpose and it is therefore dispensed with pursuant to Florida Appellate Rule 3.10, subd. e, 31 F.S.A.

Our consideration of the petition, the record and briefs leads us to conclude that [803]*803there has been no deviation from the essential requirements of law.

The petition is therefore denied.

The petition for attorney’s fee is also denied.

It is so ordered.

THORNAL, C. J., and DREW, O’CON-NELL, CALDWELL and ERVIN, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
188 So. 2d 802, 1966 Fla. LEXIS 3446, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-roof-truss-sales-inc-fla-1966.