Gardner v. Reimann

Fourth Circuit

Gardner v. Reimann

89 F. App'x 850

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided March 17, 2004·No. No. 03-2486·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerome P. Reimann appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Reimann, Nos. CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 18, 2003 & entered Nov. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerome P. Reimann appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Reimann, Nos. CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 18, 2003 & entered Nov. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Gardner v. Reimann, 89 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

89 F. App'x 850 (Gardner v. Reimann) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related