Gardner v. Reimann

Fourth Circuit

Gardner v. Reimann

89 F. App'x 850

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit

DecidedMarch 17, 2004

DocketNo. 03-2486

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 89 F. App'x 850 (Gardner v. Reimann) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardner v. Reimann, 89 F. App'x 850 (4th Cir. 2004).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM:

Jerome P. Reimann appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Reimann, Nos. CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 18, 2003 & entered Nov. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM:

Jerome P. Reimann appeals the district court’s order dismissing his appeal from the bankruptcy court as untimely filed. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Reimann, Nos. CA-03-794-FL-5; BK-01-1319-5-ATS (E.D.N.C. filed Nov. 18, 2003 & entered Nov. 19, 2003). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

89 F. App'x 850, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-reimann-ca4-2004.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack