Gardner v. Perkins

9 Cal. 553
California Supreme Court·Decided July 1, 1858·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

Field, J., delivered the opinion of the Court—Burnett, J., concurring.

Where the motion is made upon hill and answer alone, the general rule is to dissolve the injunction, if the answer denies all the equities of the bill. (Hoffman v. Livingston, 1 Johns. C., 211; Livingston v. Livingston, 4 Paige, 111.) There are exceptions to the rule, but they depend upon the special circumstances of the particular cases. (Dean v. Coddington, 2 Johns. C., [554]*554202.) There is nothing disclosed in the record which should take the present case from its operation.

Judgment affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Perkins, 9 Cal. 553 (Cal. 1858).

9 Cal. 553 (Gardner v. Perkins) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Burnett v. Whitesides
13 Cal. 156 (California Supreme Court, 1859)