Gardner v. Pereboom

398 P.2d 300, 194 Kan. 239
Procedural entryThis page is a short order in Gardner v. Pereboom. Read the opinion of the Court — 197 Kan. 188
Supreme Court of Kansas·Decided January 23, 1965·No. No. 43,909·Published

Opinion

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Hatcher, C.:

Evanne Gardner brought this action to recover damages for the loss of service and medical expense resulting from the injury to her 14 year old son in an automobile collision. Her claim for loss of services was later withdrawn. The case was consolidated with others and the trial resulted in a verdict and judgment for the defendant. The plaintiff has perfected this appeal challenging the order of consolidation and other rulings.

For all practical purposes the issue raised by this appeal is the same as the one involved and determined in Gardner v. Pereboom, 194 Kan. 231, 398 P. 2d 293, this day decided. Therefore based on what is said and held in that opinion the judgment in the instant case must be reversed with instructions to grant a separate trial.

It is so ordered.

APPROVED BY THE COURT.

Price, Fatzer and Schroeder JJ., dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Pereboom, 398 P.2d 300, 194 Kan. 239 (kan 1965).

398 P.2d 300 (Gardner v. Pereboom) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardner v. Pereboom
398 P.2d 293 (Supreme Court of Kansas, 1965)