Gardner v. Payne

• Court: District Court, E.D. Arkansas
• Decided: March 3, 2023
• Docket: 4:22-cv-01138
• Status: Unknown

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF ARKANSAS CENTRAL DIVISION

MICHAEL VALENTINE GARDNER PETITIONER ADC #175884

V. CASE NO. 4:22-cv-01138-JM-JTK

DEXTER PAYNE, Director, ADC, T HURST, Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC, J MOSS, Deputy Warden, Grimes Unit, ADC RESPONDENTS

ORDER

Michael Valentine Gardner filed a pro se petition for writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2241. (Doc. No. 1) In his petition, Mr. Gardner complains that medical staff at the Grimes Unit of the Arkansas Department of Corrections (“ADC”) violated his rights under the Eighth and Fourteenth Amendments to the United States Constitution. (Doc. No. 1) More specifically, he claims that defendants have demonstrated a deliberate indifference to his serious medical needs. (Doc. No. 1 at p. 2) Mr. Gardner’s allegations have nothing to do with the fact or length of his confinement, so his claims are not appropriate for consideration as a habeas corpus petition. A habeas corpus petition challenges only the validity or length of confinement. Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 481–482 (1994). It is “an attack by a person in custody upon the legality of that custody, and the traditional function of the writ is to secure release from illegal custody.” Preiser v. Rodriguez, 411 U.S. 475, 484 (1973). Here, Mr. Gardner challenges the medical care he has received during his incarceration, which concern conditions of his confinement. If he wishes to pursue conditions-of-confinement claims by converting his petition to a civil complaint, he must so inform the court within thirty days of the date of this order. Failure to convert the case to a civil action will result in dismissal of the habeas corpus petition, without prejudice. If Mr. Gardner decides to convert his petition to a civil action, he will also need to pay the filing fee or file a motion to proceed in forma pauperis (“IFP”). All civil cases filed by prisoners require the plaintiff to pay a $402 filing fee. If Mr. Gardner is granted IFP status, the $402 filing fee will be deducted from his prison trust account in monthly installments. Failure to fully comply with this order within thirty (30) days will result in dismissal of this action under Local Rule 5.5(c)(2) and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure. Mr. Gardner’s other pending motions (Doc. Nos. 3, 8, 9, 11, 13, 14, 16, 17, 18, 19) are premature until after screening and, therefore, will be denied. IT IS SO ORDERED, this 3rd day of March, 2023.

‘UNITED STATES MAGISTRATE JUDGE