Gardner v. . Neil

4 N.C. 104
Supreme Court of North Carolina·Decided January 5, 1814·Published·Cited by 7 cases

Opinion

Every entry by one into the dwelling-house of another, against the will of the occupant, is a trespass, unless warranted by such authority in law as will justify the entry. And the action of trespass is the only proper form of action which the party complaining can legally maintain in such case.

Whether the warrant under and by virtue of which the defendants justify their entry into the dwelling-house of the plaintiff will amount to a complete justification or not depends on facts not now before the Court.

As the Court is of opinion that the form of the action is proper, it is unnecessary to decide the second question stated in the case sent up.

Rule made absolute, and new trial granted. *Page 83

(105)

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. . Neil, 4 N.C. 104 (N.C. 1814).

4 N.C. 104 (Gardner v. . Neil) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

United States v. Tyrone Christian
925 F.3d 305 (Sixth Circuit, 2019)
Neil Morgan v. Fairfield Cty., Ohio
903 F.3d 553 (Sixth Circuit, 2018)
Gamble v. Keyes
153 N.W. 888 (South Dakota Supreme Court, 1915)
Krehbiel v. Henkle
121 N.W. 378 (Supreme Court of Iowa, 1909)