Gardner v. Littlejohn

Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court

Gardner v. Littlejohn

11 Am. Tribal Law 410

Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court·Decided April 16, 2012·No. No. SU 12-02·Published

Opinion

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

This case comes before the full Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court on April 14. [411]*4112012 on the Appellant’s Petition for Permission to Appeal, filed on April 10, 2012 of the Trial Court’s Order (Determination on Remand) in CV 10-47. This matter is before the Court to determine if the request for an interlocutory appeal should be granted. In this instance, the Appellant has not provided a satisfactory basis for this Court to accept an interlocutory appeal. The Trial Court is following the Supreme Court Decision and any issues stemming from that will be appealable as a final appeal.

For these reasons, this Court hereby ORDERS:

1. That the Appellant’s Petition for Permission to Appeal is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. EGI HES-KEKJET.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

This case comes before the full Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court on April 14. [411]*4112012 on the Appellant’s Petition for Permission to Appeal, filed on April 10, 2012 of the Trial Court’s Order (Determination on Remand) in CV 10-47. This matter is before the Court to determine if the request for an interlocutory appeal should be granted. In this instance, the Appellant has not provided a satisfactory basis for this Court to accept an interlocutory appeal. The Trial Court is following the Supreme Court Decision and any issues stemming from that will be appealable as a final appeal.

For these reasons, this Court hereby ORDERS:

1. That the Appellant’s Petition for Permission to Appeal is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. EGI HES-KEKJET.

Gardner v. Littlejohn, 11 Am. Tribal Law 410 (hochunk 2012).

Pincite

11 Am. Tribal Law 410 (Gardner v. Littlejohn) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.