Gardner v. Littlejohn

11 Am. Tribal Law 410
CourtHo-Chunk Nation Supreme Court
DecidedApril 16, 2012
DocketNo. SU 12-02
StatusPublished

This text of 11 Am. Tribal Law 410 (Gardner v. Littlejohn) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner v. Littlejohn, 11 Am. Tribal Law 410 (hochunk 2012).

Opinion

ORDER DENYING APPEAL

PER CURIAM.

This case comes before the full Ho-Chunk Nation Supreme Court on April 14. [411]*4112012 on the Appellant’s Petition for Permission to Appeal, filed on April 10, 2012 of the Trial Court’s Order (Determination on Remand) in CV 10-47. This matter is before the Court to determine if the request for an interlocutory appeal should be granted. In this instance, the Appellant has not provided a satisfactory basis for this Court to accept an interlocutory appeal. The Trial Court is following the Supreme Court Decision and any issues stemming from that will be appealable as a final appeal.

For these reasons, this Court hereby ORDERS:

1. That the Appellant’s Petition for Permission to Appeal is denied.

IT IS SO ORDERED. EGI HES-KEKJET.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
11 Am. Tribal Law 410, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-littlejohn-hochunk-2012.