Gardner v. Library of Congress

774 F.2d 1081, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15285
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit·Decided September 26, 1985·No. Undocketed No. FMCS83K/23185·Published·Cited by 4 cases

Opinion

ORDER *

Petitioner has filed a direct appeal seeking review of her removal from employment with the Library of Congress. Because the Library is part of the Legislative Branch, its employees are not in the competitive service, 5 U.S.C. § 2102, and may not appeal adverse actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board).

Our jurisdiction to consider appeals of adverse actions is limited to those determined in final decisions of the Board. 5 U.S.C. §§ 7703(b)(2); 7703(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9). This court is therefore without jurisdiction to consider the present appeal. It is therefore

ORDERED:

- Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Library of Congress, 774 F.2d 1081, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15285 (Fed. Cir. 1985).

774 F.2d 1081 (Gardner v. Library of Congress) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Carter v. Library of Congress
261 F. App'x 283 (Federal Circuit, 2008)
American Federation of Government Employees TSA Local 1 v. Hawley
481 F. Supp. 2d 72 (District of Columbia, 2006)
Jan Nieuwdorp v. Library of Congress
872 F.2d 1000 (Federal Circuit, 1989)