Gardner v. Library of Congress
This text of 774 F.2d 1081 (Gardner v. Library of Congress) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
Petitioner has filed a direct appeal seeking review of her removal from employment with the Library of Congress. Because the Library is part of the Legislative Branch, its employees are not in the competitive service, 5 U.S.C. § 2102, and may not appeal adverse actions to the Merit Systems Protection Board (Board).
Our jurisdiction to consider appeals of adverse actions is limited to those determined in final decisions of the Board. 5 U.S.C. §§ 7703(b)(2); 7703(d); 28 U.S.C. § 1295(a)(9). This court is therefore without jurisdiction to consider the present appeal. It is therefore
ORDERED:
- Respondent’s motion to dismiss is granted.
This Order was issued in unpublished form on September 9, 1985. It is converted to published form in response to respondent’s motion filed September 23, 1985.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
774 F.2d 1081, 1985 U.S. App. LEXIS 15285, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-library-of-congress-cafc-1985.