Gardner v. Lake

Eighth Circuit

Gardner v. Lake

114 F. 306, 52 C.C.A. 218, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4101

CourtCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

DecidedMarch 3, 1902

DocketNo. 1,623

StatusPublished

This text of 114 F. 306 (Gardner v. Lake) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardner v. Lake, 114 F. 306, 52 C.C.A. 218, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4101 (8th Cir. 1902).

Pincite

Opinion

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

By agreement of the parties in writing filed with the clerk, this action was tried by the court. The court’s finding was general in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered accordingly. No exceptions were taken during the trial to the admission or rejection of evidence or to any other ruling of the court, the record does not contain the evidence, there is no bill of exceptions, and the complaint states a good cause of action. On this state of the record, we cannot consider the errors assigned. The presumption is that the judgment of the circuit court was right, and it is accordingly affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

CALDWELL, Circuit Judge.

By agreement of the parties in writing filed with the clerk, this action was tried by the court. The court’s finding was general in favor of the plaintiff, and judgment was rendered accordingly. No exceptions were taken during the trial to the admission or rejection of evidence or to any other ruling of the court, the record does not contain the evidence, there is no bill of exceptions, and the complaint states a good cause of action. On this state of the record, we cannot consider the errors assigned. The presumption is that the judgment of the circuit court was right, and it is accordingly affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

114 F. 306, 52 C.C.A. 218, 1902 U.S. App. LEXIS 4101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-lake-ca8-1902.