Gardner v. Kirven
191 S.E. 814, 184 S.C. 37, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 139
This text of 191 S.E. 814 (Gardner v. Kirven) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gardner v. Kirven, 191 S.E. 814, 184 S.C. 37, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 139 (S.C. 1937).
Opinions
The opinion of the Court was delivered by
I regret that I am unable to agree with Mr. Justice Baker that the judgment in this case should be reversed in part. A careful study of the record convinces me that Judge Oxner correctly decided all questions involved. His order, therefore, which will be reported, is affirmed in toto.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
China Construction America v. MS Production Solutions
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2019
Spikes v. Cunningham
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2016
PCS Nitrogen, Inc. v. Ross Development Corp.
127 F. Supp. 3d 568 (D. South Carolina, 2015)
Campbell v. Hanckel (In re Hanckel)
512 B.R. 539 (D. South Carolina, 2014)
Oskin v. Johnson
735 S.E.2d 459 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 2012)
Bakst v. Probst (In Re Amelung)
436 B.R. 806 (D. South Carolina, 2010)
Mallek v. Tangeman
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008
One Hundred Eighth Cookingham, Inc. v. Miller
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2008
McMasters v. Charpia
Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2007
Albertson v. Robinson
638 S.E.2d 81 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 2006)
Campbell v. Deans (In Re J.R. Deans Co.)
249 B.R. 121 (D. South Carolina, 2000)
Campbell v. Haddock (In Re Haddock)
246 B.R. 810 (D. South Carolina, 2000)
Royal Z Lanes, Inc. v. Collins Holding Corp.
524 S.E.2d 621 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1999)
Windsor Properties, Inc. v. Dolphin Head Construction Co.
498 S.E.2d 858 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1998)
Future Group, II v. Nationsbank
478 S.E.2d 45 (Supreme Court of South Carolina, 1996)
First Union National Bank v. Smith
445 S.E.2d 457 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1994)
Durham v. Blackard
438 S.E.2d 259 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1993)
Sumner v. Janicare, Inc.
366 S.E.2d 20 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1988)
South Carolina National Bank v. Halter
359 S.E.2d 74 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)
Dufresne v. Regency Realty, Inc.
366 S.E.2d 256 (Court of Appeals of South Carolina, 1987)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
191 S.E. 814, 184 S.C. 37, 1937 S.C. LEXIS 139, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-kirven-sc-1937.