Gardner v. Heirs of Ellis

Superior Court of North Carolina

Gardner v. Heirs of Ellis

1 N.C. 106

DecidedMarch 15, 1799

StatusPublished

This text of 1 N.C. 106 (Gardner v. Heirs of Ellis) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Superior Court of North Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardner v. Heirs of Ellis, 1 N.C. 106 (N.C. Ct. App. 1799).

Pincite

Opinion

Moore, J.

The practice of appointing a guardian upon the return of a sci : fa: after service upon the infant, is liable to objection : for as such guardian gives no security, the infant may lose a remedy against him, if he mismanages the defence. We will, However, appoint a guardian for this defence ; but it is proper to take notice, that hereafter, applications should be made to the proper court, for the appointment of guardians, before the fci: fa: issues.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Moore, J.

The practice of appointing a guardian upon the return of a sci : fa: after service upon the infant, is liable to objection : for as such guardian gives no security, the infant may lose a remedy against him, if he mismanages the defence. We will, However, appoint a guardian for this defence ; but it is proper to take notice, that hereafter, applications should be made to the proper court, for the appointment of guardians, before the fci: fa: issues.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1 N.C. 106, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-heirs-of-ellis-ncsuperct-1799.