Gardner v. Harden
7 S.C. Eq. 32
This text of 7 S.C. Eq. 32 (Gardner v. Harden) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of South Carolina primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gardner v. Harden, 7 S.C. Eq. 32 (S.C. Ct. App. 1827).
Opinion
Curia, per
All cases of this sort must depend, in a great measure, on their own peculiar circumstances.
They must, therefore, be left very much to the discretion of the judge to whom the application is made. It does not appear to this court that the power has been improperly exercised on this occasion. The motion must, therefore, be refused and the decree affirmed.
Decree affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
7 S.C. Eq. 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-harden-scctapp-1827.