Gardner v. Gardner

Supreme Court of New Hampshire

Gardner v. Gardner

56 A. 316, 72 N.H. 257, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 60

Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided October 6, 1903·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Bemick, J.

The petitioners are advised that the only property of the estate of Sarah B. Hubbard which can be used to carry out the provisions of item 22 of her will is the fifty shares of the Manchester Traction, Light, and Power Company owned by her at her decease. Wallace v. Wallace, 23 N. H. 149; Ford v Ford, 23 N. H. 212; Loring v. Woodward, 41 N. H. 391; Fellows v. Allen, 60 N. H. 439, 441; Hoitt v. Hoitt, 63 N. H. 475, 497.

Gase discharged.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Bemick, J.

The petitioners are advised that the only property of the estate of Sarah B. Hubbard which can be used to carry out the provisions of item 22 of her will is the fifty shares of the Manchester Traction, Light, and Power Company owned by her at her decease. Wallace v. Wallace, 23 N. H. 149; Ford v Ford, 23 N. H. 212; Loring v. Woodward, 41 N. H. 391; Fellows v. Allen, 60 N. H. 439, 441; Hoitt v. Hoitt, 63 N. H. 475, 497.

Gase discharged.

All concurred.

Gardner v. Gardner, 56 A. 316, 72 N.H. 257, 1903 N.H. LEXIS 60 (N.H. 1903).

Pincite

56 A. 316 (Gardner v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related