Gardner v. Gardner
402 N.E.2d 1109, 9 Mass. App. Ct. 899, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1110
Opinion
We are again asked to set aside a division of property ordered within a judgment for divorce nisi. The record demonstrates “beyond doubt that the judge considered all the factors set forth” in G. L. c. 208, § 34. Furthermore, his findings are supported by the evidence. The judge has broad discretion in fashioning a judgment under § 34. See Bianco v. Bianco, 371 Mass. 420, 423 (1976). See also Putnam v. Putnam, 5 Mass. App. Ct. 10, 14 (1977), S.C., 7 Mass. App. Ct. 672 (1979).
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Gardner v. Gardner, 402 N.E.2d 1109, 9 Mass. App. Ct. 899, 1980 Mass. App. LEXIS 1110 (Mass. Ct. App. 1980).
402 N.E.2d 1109 (Gardner v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Bianco v. Bianco
358 N.E.2d 243 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1976)
Putnam v. Putnam
358 N.E.2d 837 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1977)
Putnam v. Putnam
389 N.E.2d 777 (Massachusetts Appeals Court, 1979)