Gardner v. Gardner

51 F. App'x 681
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit·Decided November 21, 2002·No. No. 02-35345; D.C. No. CV-02-00001-AAM·Published

Opinion

MEMORANDUM **

Sandra Lee Gardner appeals pro se the district court’s dismissal of her action against her former husband, Melvin C. Gardner, and the district court’s denial of her motion for reconsideration.

The district court correctly found that because the claims in Sandra Gardner’s complaint were inextricably intertwined with the state court dissolution proceedings, it lacked jurisdiction over the action under the Rooker-Feldman doctrine. District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman, 460 U.S. 462, 483 n. 16, 485-86, 103 S.Ct. 1303, 75 L.Ed.2d 206 (1983); Olson Farms, Inc. v. Barbosa, 134 F.3d 933, 936 (9th Cir.1998).

AFFIRMED.

Footnotes

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Gardner, 51 F. App'x 681 (9th Cir. 2002).

51 F. App'x 681 (Gardner v. Gardner) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. Feldman
460 U.S. 462 (Supreme Court, 1983)
Olson Farms, Inc. v. Barbosa
134 F.3d 933 (Ninth Circuit, 1998)