Gardner v. Frederick
This text of 160 P. 754 (Gardner v. Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Plaintiff-respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon two grounds, (1) that the notice of appeal was not served upon the surety in a costs bond filed by plaintiff in the lower court; (2) that the appeal bond is not conditioned as required by the governing statute, Rem. 1915 Code, § 1722.
To meet the first ground, appellants have filed in this court a written waiver releasing the surety in the costs bond from all liability thereon. Under our recent decision in Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., ante p. 233, 160 Pac. 753, the motion on the first ground must be denied.
' We have examined the appeal bond and find that its conditions present a substantial compliance with the statutory requirements.
The motion is overruled.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-frederick-wash-1916.