Gardner v. Frederick

160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1188
CourtWashington Supreme Court
DecidedOctober 24, 1916
DocketNo. 13623
StatusPublished

This text of 160 P. 754 (Gardner v. Frederick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Washington Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner v. Frederick, 160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1188 (Wash. 1916).

Opinion

Per Curiam.

Plaintiff-respondent has moved to dismiss this appeal upon two grounds, (1) that the notice of appeal was not served upon the surety in a costs bond filed by plaintiff in the lower court; (2) that the appeal bond is not conditioned as required by the governing statute, Rem. 1915 Code, § 1722.

To meet the first ground, appellants have filed in this court a written waiver releasing the surety in the costs bond from all liability thereon. Under our recent decision in Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co., ante p. 233, 160 Pac. 753, the motion on the first ground must be denied.

' We have examined the appeal bond and find that its conditions present a substantial compliance with the statutory requirements.

The motion is overruled.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Roberts v. Pacific Telephone & Telegraph Co.
160 P. 753 (Washington Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 P. 754, 93 Wash. 698, 1916 Wash. LEXIS 1188, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-frederick-wash-1916.