Gardner v. Flagg
8 Mass. 101
This text of 8 Mass. 101 (Gardner v. Flagg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gardner v. Flagg, 8 Mass. 101 (Mass. 1811).
Opinion
The security is not void, although an indictment, or an action of the case, may lie for receiving the usury. Let the demandant have judgment on his demurrer.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Lindsay v. Hill
66 Me. 212 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1876)
Ossipee v. Gafney
56 N.H. 352 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1876)
Knapp v. Abell
92 Mass. 485 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1865)
City of Aurora v. West
22 Ind. 503 (Indiana Supreme Court, 1864)
Drury v. Morse
85 Mass. 445 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1862)
Tuttle v. Fowler
22 Conn. 58 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1852)
Clark v. Phelps
47 Mass. 296 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1843)
Pace v. Estes
36 Mass. 269 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1837)
Lowell v. Johnson
14 Me. 240 (Supreme Judicial Court of Maine, 1837)
Knights v. Putnam
20 Mass. 184 (Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court, 1825)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
8 Mass. 101, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-flagg-mass-1811.