Gardner v. Commercial City Bank
101 S.E. 584, 24 Ga. App. 536, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 906
This text of 101 S.E. 584 (Gardner v. Commercial City Bank) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gardner v. Commercial City Bank, 101 S.E. 584, 24 Ga. App. 536, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 906 (Ga. Ct. App. 1919).
Opinion
The motion for a new trial contained only the usual general grounds; there was an acute conflict in the evidence as to whether the defendant executed the note sued upon, but the finding of the jury that she did was authorized, and the court did not err in overruling the motion for a new trial.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
101 S.E. 584, 24 Ga. App. 536, 1919 Ga. App. LEXIS 906, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-commercial-city-bank-gactapp-1919.