Gardner v. Chater

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided March 21, 1996·No. 95-20868·Unpublished

Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS FOR THE FIFTH CIRCUIT

__________________

No. 95-20868 Summary Calendar __________________

ESTHER GARDNER,

Plaintiff-Appellant,

versus

SHIRLEY S. CHATER, COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY,

Defendant-Appellee.

- - - - - - - - - - Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of Texas USDC No. H-94-CV-3876 - - - - - - - - - - April 11, 1996 Before DAVIS, BARKSDALE and DeMOSS, Circuit Judges.

PER CURIAM:*

Esther Gardner appeals the district court's grant of summary

judgment affirming the Commissioner of Social Security's

determination that Gardner is not disabled within the meaning of

the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). She argues that the

rejection of her testimony concerning the frequency and duration

of her transient ischemic attacks as not credible is not

supported by substantial evidence. We have reviewed the record

and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the

* Pursuant to Local Rule 47.5, the court has determined that this opinion should not be published and is not precedent except under the limited circumstances set forth in Local Rule 47.5.4. No. 95-20868 -2-

reasons stated by the district court. See Gardner v. Chater, No.

H-94-3876 (S.D. Tex. Sept. 8, 1995).

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner v. Chater, (5th Cir. 1996).

Gardner v. Chater (Gardner v. Chater) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related