Gardner v. Central Park, North & East River Railroad
168 A.D. 912, 152 N.Y.S. 1112
CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
DecidedApril 15, 1915
StatusPublished
This text of 168 A.D. 912 (Gardner v. Central Park, North & East River Railroad) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gardner v. Central Park, North & East River Railroad, 168 A.D. 912, 152 N.Y.S. 1112 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1915).
Opinion
Judgment and order affirmed, with costs. No opinion. Present — Ingraham, P. J., McLaughlin, Laughlin, Clarke and Scott, JJ.; McLaughlin and Scott, JJ., dissented on the ground that the evidence of negligence on the part of the defendant was not sufficient to justify submission of the case to the jury.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
168 A.D. 912, 152 N.Y.S. 1112, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-central-park-north-east-river-railroad-nyappdiv-1915.