Gardner v. Central Intelligence Agency

Fourth Circuit

Gardner v. Central Intelligence Agency

455 F. App'x 299

Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit·Decided November 22, 2011·No. No. 11-1836·Published

Opinion

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lael Gardner appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gardner v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, No. 1:11-cv-01126-BEL (D.Md. May 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Affirmed by unpublished PER CURIAM opinion.

Unpublished opinions are not binding precedent in this circuit.

PER CURIAM:

Lael Gardner appeals the district court’s order dismissing her complaint for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. We have reviewed the record and find no reversible error. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated by the district court. Gardner v. Cent. Intelligence Agency, No. 1:11-cv-01126-BEL (D.Md. May 12, 2011). We dispense with oral argument because the facts and legal contentions are adequately presented in the materials before the court and argument would not aid the decisional process.

AFFIRMED.

Gardner v. Central Intelligence Agency, 455 F. App'x 299 (4th Cir. 2011).

Pincite

455 F. App'x 299 (Gardner v. Central Intelligence Agency) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.