Gardner v. Bushnell Carpet, Inc.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gardner v. Bushnell Carpet, Inc.

829 S.W.2d 131, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 953, 1992 WL 109463

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 26, 1992·No. No. 61268·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against the employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Employer appeals from an order of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission allowing compensation and affirming the award of the Administrative Law Judge against the employer. We affirm. The findings and conclusions of the Commission are not clearly erroneous, and an extended opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only setting forth the reasons for our order affirming the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gardner v. Bushnell Carpet, Inc., 829 S.W.2d 131, 1992 Mo. App. LEXIS 953, 1992 WL 109463 (Mo. Ct. App. 1992).

Pincite

829 S.W.2d 131 (Gardner v. Bushnell Carpet, Inc.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.