Gardner v. Arnold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gardner v. Arnold

511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 769817, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 91

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 28, 2017·No. WD 79206·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Attorney R. Scott Gardner appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Pettis County revoking letters testamentary which had appointed him as the personal representative of the estate of Ethel Hall. Gardner argues that the judge who issued the challenged order erroneously denied Gardner’s Application for Change of Judge filed pursuant to § 472.060, RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Attorney R. Scott Gardner appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Pettis County revoking letters testamentary which had appointed him as the personal representative of the estate of Ethel Hall. Gardner argues that the judge who issued the challenged order erroneously denied Gardner’s Application for Change of Judge filed pursuant to § 472.060, RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Gardner v. Arnold, 511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 769817, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 91 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

511 S.W.3d 470 (Gardner v. Arnold) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.