Gardner v. Arnold

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gardner v. Arnold

511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 769817, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 91

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 28, 2017

DocketWD 79206

StatusPublished

This text of 511 S.W.3d 470 (Gardner v. Arnold) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardner v. Arnold, 511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 769817, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 91 (Mo. Ct. App. 2017).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Attorney R. Scott Gardner appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Pettis County revoking letters testamentary which had appointed him as the personal representative of the estate of Ethel Hall. Gardner argues that the judge who issued the challenged order erroneously denied Gardner’s Application for Change of Judge filed pursuant to § 472.060, RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Attorney R. Scott Gardner appeals from an order of the Circuit Court of Pettis County revoking letters testamentary which had appointed him as the personal representative of the estate of Ethel Hall. Gardner argues that the judge who issued the challenged order erroneously denied Gardner’s Application for Change of Judge filed pursuant to § 472.060, RSMo. We affirm. Because a published opinion would have no precedential value, we have provided the parties with an unpublished memorandum setting forth the reasons for this order. Rule 84.16(b).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

511 S.W.3d 470, 2017 WL 769817, 2017 Mo. App. LEXIS 91, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-v-arnold-moctapp-2017.