Gardner v. Alexian Bros.

Missouri Court of Appeals

Gardner v. Alexian Bros.

411 S.W.3d 323, 2013 WL 5232749, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1068

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 17, 2013·No. No. ED 99437·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eronne Gardner (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying her employment benefits. In her two points on appeal, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she voluntarily quit her employment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Eronne Gardner (“Claimant”) appeals from the decision of the Labor and Industrial Relations Commission (“Commission”) denying her employment benefits. In her two points on appeal, Claimant contends that the Commission erred in finding that she voluntarily quit her employment.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claim of error to be without merit. An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Gardner v. Alexian Bros., 411 S.W.3d 323, 2013 WL 5232749, 2013 Mo. App. LEXIS 1068 (Mo. Ct. App. 2013).

Pincite

411 S.W.3d 323 (Gardner v. Alexian Bros.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.