Gardner, Scott Arthur

CourtCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas
DecidedSeptember 28, 2011
DocketWR-75,825-02
StatusPublished

This text of Gardner, Scott Arthur (Gardner, Scott Arthur) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardner, Scott Arthur, (Tex. 2011).

Opinion



IN THE COURT OF CRIMINAL APPEALS

OF TEXAS



NOS. WR-75,825-01 AND -02
EX PARTE SCOTT ARTHUR GARDNER, Applicant


ON APPLICATIONS FOR WRITS OF HABEAS CORPUS

CAUSE NOS. F-0245405-SV AND F-0245407-SV

IN THE 292ND JUDICIAL DISTRICT COURT FROM DALLAS COUNTY

Per curiam.

O R D E R



Pursuant to the provisions of Article 11.07 of the Texas Code of Criminal Procedure, the clerk of the trial court transmitted to this Court these applications for writs of habeas corpus. Ex parte Young, 418 S.W.2d 824, 826 (Tex. Crim. App. 1967). Applicant was convicted of two charges of aggravated sexual assault of a child and was sentenced to two cumulated terms of twelve years' imprisonment. The convictions and sentences were affirmed on direct appeal. Gardner v. State, No. 05-04-00587-CR (Tex. App.--Dallas del. July 15, 2005).

Applicant contends in his applications that he is actually innocent of the offenses, that he was denied his right to effective assistance of counsel, and that the State failed to disclose favorable and material evidence in accordance with Brady v. Maryland, 373 U.S. 83, 87-88 (1963). After a live evidentiary hearing, the trial court entered findings of fact and recommends that relief be denied.

After an independent review of the record provided to this Court, including a transcript of the evidentiary hearing, we agree with the trial court's recommendation. Relief on Applicant's claims should be denied. The trial court's findings of fact are supported by the record and are adopted by this Court as our own except for Finding Numbers 57, 64, 65, 70, and 85, which this Court does not adopt.

Relief is therefore denied.



Delivered: September 28, 2011



Do Not Publish

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Brady v. Maryland
373 U.S. 83 (Supreme Court, 1963)
Ex Parte Young
418 S.W.2d 824 (Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas, 1967)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
Gardner, Scott Arthur, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardner-scott-arthur-texcrimapp-2011.