Gardner Lumber Co. v. Bank of Commerce

74 So. 313, 73 Fla. 246
Supreme Court of Florida·Decided February 2, 1917·Published·Cited by 5 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The Bank of Commerce' brought an action against the Gardner Lumber Company, a copartnership on two 'promissory notes executed by the latter payable to the bank. Issue was joined on a plea of failure of consideration. At the trial the court directed a verdict for the plaintiff on which judgment was rendered and the defendants took writ of error.

On the issue the plaintiff having- the general affirmative was entitled to open and conclude the presentation of the cause. As there was some substantial evidence tending to prove the issue of failure of consideration, [247]*247the cause should have been submitted to the jury for their consideration; therefore it was error to direct a verdict for the plaintiff, for which error the judgment is reversed.

Browne, C. J., and Taylor, Whitfield and Ellis, JJ-, concur.

Shackleford; J., took no part.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardner Lumber Co. v. Bank of Commerce, 74 So. 313, 73 Fla. 246 (Fla. 1917).

74 So. 313 (Gardner Lumber Co. v. Bank of Commerce) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Diaz v. State
747 So. 2d 1021 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
City of Fort Lauderdale v. Casino Realty, Inc.
313 So. 2d 649 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1975)
Mathews v. City of Miami
83 So. 867 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1920)
Gravette v. Turner
81 So. 476 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1919)
Glass v. Virginia-Carolina Chemical Co.
74 So. 981 (Supreme Court of Florida, 1917)