Gardipee v. State

620 So. 2d 255, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6743, 1993 WL 221423
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided June 23, 1993·No. No. 92-00374·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

THREADGILL, Judge.

The appellant, Thomas Gardipee, appeals his judgments and sentences for attempted second-degree murder and armed trespass. We affirm, except for the order imposing [256]*256restitution. At sentencing, the appellant objected to the amount of restitution being requested by the state. The trial court stated that the appellant would be permitted a restitution hearing; however, the restitution hearing was never held. The trial court imposed restitution as a condition of probation at sentencing with the amount to be determined at a later date. The trial court subsequently entered a restitution order for $54,419.87. This amount was based upon bills submitted by the victim at the sentencing hearing.

We reverse the order imposing restitution and remand for a restitution hearing. See Reynolds v. State, 598 So.2d 188 (Fla. 1st DCA 1992). The appellant has the right to be present at the hearing.

Affirmed; remanded for hearing.

FRANK, C.J., and BLUE, J., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardipee v. State, 620 So. 2d 255, 1993 Fla. App. LEXIS 6743, 1993 WL 221423 (Fla. Ct. App. 1993).

620 So. 2d 255 (Gardipee v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Stephen v. Barone v. State
222 So. 3d 1235 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 2017)