Gardiner v. Rauch

179 Misc. 606, 39 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2358
New York Supreme Court·Decided July 10, 1942·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Schreiber, J.

The judgment debtor was the beneficiary of her deceased husband’s life-insurance policies. The courts have repeatedly rejected efforts by the creditor to reach the income of the proceeds. (Grossman Co. v. Rauch, 263 N. Y. 264; Matter of Crossman Co. v. Rauch, 248 App. Div. 758, leave to appeal denied, 248 App. Div. 885, 272 N. Y. 676.) The income as well as the proceeds have been held exempt.

The debtor, without other funds or income, purchased an annuity policy providing for payment of the principal to her brother in the event of her death prior to the date of the commencement of the annuity payments to her. The creditor, by assignee, seizing upon this circumstance, again endeavors to effect collection by reaching the cash surrender value of the annuity policy under section 794 of the Civil Practice Act.

The exemption

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardiner v. Rauch, 179 Misc. 606, 39 N.Y.S.2d 652, 1942 N.Y. Misc. LEXIS 2358 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1942).

179 Misc. 606 (Gardiner v. Rauch) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Gardiner v. Rauch
265 A.D. 997 (Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, 1943)