Gardiner v. Lessee of Murray

4 Yeates 559
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania·Decided September 15, 1808·Published·Cited by 2 cases

Opinion

Per Curiam.

If this be considered as a judgment by default, it ought regularly to have been entered against the .casual ejector, and not against the defendant in possession. If Mr. Hamilton , 1 *really appeared for the defendant, and the Court of Com-5 U mon pleas have adopted that opinion by their certificate of the record, he might have removed the cause; and if there was any thing improper or irregular in this removal, application should have been made to the Circuit Court for a procedendo. After the certiorari was read and allowed below, no further proceedings could be had in that court until the suit was regularly remanded. The result necessarily is, that the

Judgment must be reversed and restitution awarded.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Gardiner v. Lessee of Murray, 4 Yeates 559 (Pa. 1808).

4 Yeates 559 (Gardiner v. Lessee of Murray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Shaw v. Boyd
12 Pa. 215 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1849)
Cochran v. Parker
6 Serg. & Rawle 549 (Supreme Court of Pennsylvania, 1821)