Gardiner v. John W. Bunn & Co.
This text of 24 Ill. App. 627 (Gardiner v. John W. Bunn & Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Court of Illinois primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
This case was before ns at the November Term, 1885, and is reported in 18 Ill. App. 94, when the judgment of the Circuit Court was reversed and the cause remanded.
Upon a second trial the court below proceeded upon the theory of the law held by this court, and we are now asked by appellant to review the same questions that were passed upon when the case was here before. We decline to do so.
Appellee assigns as cross error the holding of the court below as to the Pettingall execution, but we think such holding was correct.
However defective the possession of the stock of goods by the Sheriff may have been originally, it was perfected by a legal and complete levy and possession before appellee’s rights attached.
The judgment of the Circuit Court will be affirmed.
Judgment affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
24 Ill. App. 627, 1886 Ill. App. LEXIS 733, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardiner-v-john-w-bunn-co-illappct-1887.