Gardes v. Gardes

240 So. 2d 565, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 4866
CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal
DecidedNovember 2, 1970
DocketNo. 4326
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 240 So. 2d 565 (Gardes v. Gardes) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Gardes v. Gardes, 240 So. 2d 565, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 4866 (La. Ct. App. 1970).

Opinion

ON MOTION TO DISMISS

LeSUEUR, Judge.

As part of his response to Mrs. Gardes’ suit for separation, alimony and child support, the defendant sought an order requiring that she inventory, account for, and deliver to him all community assets in her possession and requiring, further, that she permit an examination and audit of all records and books of account in her possession. The trial court refused the order and after certiorari was denied, defendant appealed devolutively.

The plaintiff has moved to dismiss the appeal pursuant to the provisions of LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2083, which, in substance, limits appellate recourse to final judgments, at least as a general proposition.

The defendant’s principal objection to the motion to dismiss lies in the fact it was not filed within three (3) judicial days after lodging. See LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2161. That limit, however, is, by its terms, restricted to motions predicated upon “irregularity, error, or defect imputable to the appellant.” It does not, we hold, extend to the question at bar which is, in its essence, jurisdictional.

The judgment appealed from is clearly interlocutory and has no effect on the merits of the dissolution of the community. See LSA-C.C.P. Art. 2083. Should the order prejudice the defendant when the question of partition is heard and adjudicated, appellate relief would remain available.

More importantly, the defendant has made no showing of irreparable injury. Indeed, it seems clear that he has at his command an adequate remedy at law, inasmuch as the usual inventory procedures are specifically structured to protect community assets from the contingencies which he fears.

Motion granted; appeal dismissed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State ex rel. Guste v. Pickering
365 So. 2d 943 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1978)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
240 So. 2d 565, 1970 La. App. LEXIS 4866, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardes-v-gardes-lactapp-1970.