Gardenier v. Spikeman

New York Supreme Court

Gardenier v. Spikeman

10 Johns. 368

DecidedAugust 15, 1813

StatusPublished

This text of 10 Johns. 368 (Gardenier v. Spikeman) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering New York Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardenier v. Spikeman, 10 Johns. 368 (N.Y. Super. Ct. 1813).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case must be quashed as premature. The 10th section of the act (sess. 29. c. 168.) gives the appeal to the party aggrieved, after filing the report of the admeasurers of dower; and then the question of seisin, or any other question which may arise, may be tried by a jury on a feigned issue, or in some other mode, which this court may pre-1 scribe,

Appeal quashed.

END OF AUGUST TERM

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam.

The appeal in this case must be quashed as premature. The 10th section of the act (sess. 29. c. 168.) gives the appeal to the party aggrieved, after filing the report of the admeasurers of dower; and then the question of seisin, or any other question which may arise, may be tried by a jury on a feigned issue, or in some other mode, which this court may pre-1 scribe,

Appeal quashed.

END OF AUGUST TERM

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

10 Johns. 368, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardenier-v-spikeman-nysupct-1813.