Gardenhire v. Jones

Supreme Court of Oklahoma

Gardenhire v. Jones

1923 OK 758, 219 P. 92, 92 Okla. 267, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 860

CourtSupreme Court of Oklahoma

DecidedOctober 9, 1923

Docket11712

StatusPublished

This text of 1923 OK 758 (Gardenhire v. Jones) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Oklahoma primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Gardenhire v. Jones, 1923 OK 758, 219 P. 92, 92 Okla. 267, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 860 (Okla. 1923).

Pincite

Opinion

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court September 15, 1920, and the cause was submitted July 31, 1923. No brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, no additional time asked within which to file the same, and no excuse offered for failure to comply with ''Buie 7 of this (87 Okla. xix). Under such circumstances this court is authorized by Buie 7 to continue or dismiss the cause or to reverse or affirm the judgment. An examination of the record filed in this ease discloses that the judgment of the trial court is sustained by the evidence and is a proper judgment to have been rendered upon the trial of said cause.

It is therefore concluded that the judgment of the trial court in this case should be in all things affirmed.

By the Oourt: It is so ordered.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Opinion by

LOGSDON, C.

The petition in error with case-made attached was filed in this court September 15, 1920, and the cause was submitted July 31, 1923. No brief has been filed by the plaintiff in error, no additional time asked within which to file the same, and no excuse offered for failure to comply with ''Buie 7 of this (87 Okla. xix). Under such circumstances this court is authorized by Buie 7 to continue or dismiss the cause or to reverse or affirm the judgment. An examination of the record filed in this ease discloses that the judgment of the trial court is sustained by the evidence and is a proper judgment to have been rendered upon the trial of said cause.

It is therefore concluded that the judgment of the trial court in this case should be in all things affirmed.

By the Oourt: It is so ordered.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

1923 OK 758, 219 P. 92, 92 Okla. 267, 1923 Okla. LEXIS 860, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gardenhire-v-jones-okla-1923.