Garden State Properties, Inc. v. Director of the Dade County Building & Zoning Department

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Garden State Properties, Inc. v. Director of the Dade County Building & Zoning Department

292 So. 2d 67, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7724

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 26, 1974

DocketNo. 73-1031

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 292 So. 2d 67 (Garden State Properties, Inc. v. Director of the Dade County Building & Zoning Department) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garden State Properties, Inc. v. Director of the Dade County Building & Zoning Department, 292 So. 2d 67, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7724 (Fla. Ct. App. 1974).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the circuit court seeking review of a zoning decision of the Board of County Commissioners of Metropolitan Dade County. No brief or record was filed. Appellant secured in the circuit court several successive extensions of time to file the brief and record. The last extension expired June 16, 1973. Thereafter, appellant moved for another extension upon the sole ground that counsel was too busy. The County moved to dismiss the petition. The brief and record were filed before a hearing could be had on the motion. Nevertheless, the court denied the last requested extension and dismissed the petition. No abuse of discretion is shown. We affirm. See Monroe-Jackson Hospital, Inc. v. Scarane, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 6.

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

The appellant filed a petition for writ of certiorari in the circuit court seeking review of a zoning decision of the Board of County Commissioners of Metropolitan Dade County. No brief or record was filed. Appellant secured in the circuit court several successive extensions of time to file the brief and record. The last extension expired June 16, 1973. Thereafter, appellant moved for another extension upon the sole ground that counsel was too busy. The County moved to dismiss the petition. The brief and record were filed before a hearing could be had on the motion. Nevertheless, the court denied the last requested extension and dismissed the petition. No abuse of discretion is shown. We affirm. See Monroe-Jackson Hospital, Inc. v. Scarane, Fla.App.1960, 117 So.2d 6.

Affirmed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

292 So. 2d 67, 1974 Fla. App. LEXIS 7724, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garden-state-properties-inc-v-director-of-the-dade-county-building-fladistctapp-1974.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack