Gard v. Illinois
235 U.S. 691, 35 S. Ct. 206, 59 L. Ed. 428, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1038
This text of 235 U.S. 691 (Gard v. Illinois) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of the United States primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Gard v. Illinois, 235 U.S. 691, 35 S. Ct. 206, 59 L. Ed. 428, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1038 (1914).
Opinion
Dismissed for want of jurisdiction upon the authority of Gring v. Ives, 222 U. S. 365, 370; Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co., 226 U. S. 102; Ennis Water Works v. Ennis, 233 U. S. 652, 658.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Gring v. Ives
222 U.S. 365 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Deming v. Carlisle Packing Co.
226 U.S. 102 (Supreme Court, 1912)
Ennis Water Works v. City of Ennis
233 U.S. 652 (Supreme Court, 1914)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
235 U.S. 691, 35 S. Ct. 206, 59 L. Ed. 428, 1914 U.S. LEXIS 1038, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/gard-v-illinois-scotus-1914.