Garcone v. Thomas & Buckley Hoisting Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York

Garcone v. Thomas & Buckley Hoisting Co.

172 A.D. 946, 157 N.Y.S. 1126

CourtAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

DecidedFebruary 15, 1916

StatusPublished

This text of 172 A.D. 946 (Garcone v. Thomas & Buckley Hoisting Co.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Garcone v. Thomas & Buckley Hoisting Co., 172 A.D. 946, 157 N.Y.S. 1126 (N.Y. Ct. App. 1916).

Pincite

Opinion

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the terms imposed as a condition of vacating the judgment; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Per Curiam:

The order appealed from should be modified by striking out the terms imposed as a condition of vacating the judgment; and as so modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to the appellant. Present — Clarke, P. J., Dowling, Smith, Page and Davis, JJ. Order modified as stated in opinion and as modified affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements to appellant. Order to be settled on notice.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

172 A.D. 946, 157 N.Y.S. 1126, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcone-v-thomas-buckley-hoisting-co-nyappdiv-1916.