Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp.
745 So. 2d 429, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618, 1999 WL 993073
Opinion
Because the plaintiff, U.S. Floral Corporation, presented sufficient evidence of a legitimate business interest justifying the restrictive covenant, § 542.335, Fla. Stat. (1999), and irreparable harm, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610, we affirm the trial court’s entry of a temporary injunction. See Aero Kool Corp. v. Oosthuizen, 736 So.2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp., 745 So. 2d 429, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618, 1999 WL 993073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
745 So. 2d 429 (Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp.) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Aero Kool Corp. v. Oosthuizen
736 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)