Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp.
745 So. 2d 429, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618, 1999 WL 993073
This text of 745 So. 2d 429 (Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Bluebook
Garcia v. U.S. Floral Corp., 745 So. 2d 429, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618, 1999 WL 993073 (Fla. Ct. App. 1999).
Opinion
Because the plaintiff, U.S. Floral Corporation, presented sufficient evidence of a legitimate business interest justifying the restrictive covenant, § 542.335, Fla. Stat. (1999), and irreparable harm, Fla. R. Civ. P. 1.610, we affirm the trial court’s entry of a temporary injunction. See Aero Kool Corp. v. Oosthuizen, 736 So.2d 25 (Fla. 3d DCA 1999).
Affirmed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Aero Kool Corp. v. Oosthuizen
736 So. 2d 25 (District Court of Appeal of Florida, 1999)
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
Bluebook (online)
745 So. 2d 429, 1999 Fla. App. LEXIS 14618, 1999 WL 993073, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-us-floral-corp-fladistctapp-1999.