Garcia v. United States

Fifth Circuit

Garcia v. United States

243 F.2d 98

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit·Decided April 9, 1957·No. No. 16348·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

m • • . , - , Claiming that a sentence of two years to run consecutively with a sentence defendant was serving was, because of the provisions of Section 3568, Title 18 U.S. D., beyond the power of the court to impose, appellant filed a motion, pursuant to Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C., to vacate an<^ se^ it aside.

m7 ,. , . , . . The district judge, m an unreported . . . . , . opinion giving the correct reasons for his ,. , .®. . , _ , actl0n and Cltmg m suPPort Dockery v. Hiatt, 5 Cir., 197 F.2d 333 and Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir 192 F.2d 119 denied his mo-tion, and this appeal followed,

For the reasons given and upon the authorities cited by the district judge, the judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

m • • . , - , Claiming that a sentence of two years to run consecutively with a sentence defendant was serving was, because of the provisions of Section 3568, Title 18 U.S. D., beyond the power of the court to impose, appellant filed a motion, pursuant to Section 2255, Title 28 U.S.C., to vacate an<^ se^ it aside.

m7 ,. , . , . . The district judge, m an unreported . . . . , . opinion giving the correct reasons for his ,. , .®. . , _ , actl0n and Cltmg m suPPort Dockery v. Hiatt, 5 Cir., 197 F.2d 333 and Hiatt v. Ellis, 5 Cir 192 F.2d 119 denied his mo-tion, and this appeal followed,

For the reasons given and upon the authorities cited by the district judge, the judgment appealed from is Affirmed.

Garcia v. United States, 243 F.2d 98 (5th Cir. 1957).

Pincite

243 F.2d 98 (Garcia v. United States) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related