Garcia v. Tomei

78 A.D.3d 834, 910 N.Y.S.2d 379

This text of 78 A.D.3d 834 (Garcia v. Tomei) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
Garcia v. Tomei, 78 A.D.3d 834, 910 N.Y.S.2d 379 (N.Y. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

Proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 in the nature of prohibition to prohibit the respondent Albert Tomei, a Justice of the Supreme Court, Kings County, from (1) deciding a pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus, and (2) performing or taking any action with respect to the petitioner, and application by the petitioner to prosecute the petition as a poor person.

Ordered that the application to prosecute the petition as a poor person is granted to the extent that the filing fee imposed by CPLR 8022 (b) is waived, and the application is otherwise denied as academic; and it is further,

Adjudged that the branch of the petition which is to prohibit the respondent Albert Tomei from deciding a pending petition for a writ of habeas corpus is denied as academic, without costs or disbursements, on the ground that the petition for a writ of habeas corpus was decided by order dated June 26, 2010; and it is further,

Adjudged that the petition is otherwise denied and the proceeding is dismissed, without costs or disbursements.

“Because of its extraordinary nature, prohibition is available only where there is a clear legal right, and then only when a court — in cases where judicial authority is challenged — acts or threatens to act either without jurisdiction or in excess of its authorized powers” (Matter of Holtzman v Goldman, 71 NY2d 564, 569 [1988]; see Matter of Rush v Mordue, 68 NY2d 348, 352 [1986]). The petitioner has failed to demonstrate a clear legal right to the relief sought. Skelos, J.P., Dickerson, Eng and Lott, JJ., concur.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Rush v. Mordue
502 N.E.2d 170 (New York Court of Appeals, 1986)
Holtzman v. Goldman
523 N.E.2d 297 (New York Court of Appeals, 1988)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
78 A.D.3d 834, 910 N.Y.S.2d 379, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/garcia-v-tomei-nyappdiv-2010.